JOE Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (1988) 119, 421-429       DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1190421
© 1988 Society for Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foltzer-Jourdainne, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mialhe, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foltzer-Jourdainne, C.
Right arrow Articles by Mialhe, P.

In-vitro control of growth hormone secretion by synthetic releasing factors in young and adult ducks (Anas platyrhynchos)

C. Foltzer-Jourdainne, S. Harvey and P. Mialhe

Release of GH from perifused duckling hemipituitaries was stimulated, in a biphasic manner, by synthetic TRH and human pancreatic GH-releasing factor (GRF). At all effective concentrations, the level of GH release was increased within 5 min of TRH or GRF perifusion and was maximal after 10 min of TRH perifusion and after 20 min of GRF perifusion. Although TRH was perifused for 20 min the level of GH release declined during the last 10 min. The most effective dose of TRH (1·0 µg/ml; 2·7 µmol/l) and GRF (0·5 µg/ml; 110 nmol/l) provoked similar (250– 300%) increases in the level of GH release. However, since the effect of TRH was only of short duration, the total release of GH induced by GRF was higher than that elicited by TRH, especially with the low dose. The increase in release of GH induced by TRH or GRF was blunted when pituitaries from adult ducks were used. As in young ducks, the GH response to GRF was higher, whereas the response to TRH was very low. The GH response of perifused adult pituitaries to GRF was, however, potentiated when TRH was perifused simultaneously. The basal release of GH from both young and adult pituitary glands was unaffected by perifusion with somatostatin-14 (SRIF-14) at doses of 1 and 2 µg/ml. The perifusion of hemipituitary glands with similar doses of SRIF-14 was also unable to suppress the stimulation of GH release induced by prior perifusion with GRF, although when SRIF-14 and TRH were simultaneously perifused TRH-induced GH release was markedly suppressed.

These results demonstrate direct effects and interactions of TRH, GRF and SRIF on the release of GH from duck pituitary glands. GRF is the most potent releasing factor for GH in both young and adult ducks although in adult ducks it is less effective. These results also provide evidence that the age-related decline in the in-vivo GH response to TRH is due to a desensitization of pituitary somatotrophs.

J. Endocr. (1988) 119, 421–429







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the Society for Endocrinology.