JOE Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (1989) 120, 361-362    DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1200361
© 1989 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peaker, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Peaker, M.

Molecular endocrinology: a welcome extension to, but not a replacement for, endocrinology

M. Peaker

In any history of biology, the 1980s will surely be noted for the extremely rapid pervasion of the concepts and techniques of molecular biology into other fields. Endocrinology is one of those fields and we have new conferences and new journals (including our new sister journal) to reflect this burgeoning interest. The pervasiveness of molecular biology is not surprising since there is no doubt that this new discipline brings enormous heuristic power in science and applicability in technology: it allows the exploration of biological mechanisms in terms and with exactitudes undreamt of even a few years earlier; equally it holds the key to major advances in the manipulation of biological processes in medicine and agriculture as well as in the newer industrial processes labelled as biotechnology.

But there are dangers in the headlong rush. The explanatory reductionist approach, of which molecular biology is the newest example, has been extremely successful







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the Society for Endocrinology.