JOE
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (1989) 121, 43-48    DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1210043
© 1989 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frankel, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Frankel, A. I.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, B.

The testicular response to hemicastration in the male rat cannot be maintained in vitro

A. I. Frankel, J. C. Chapman and B. Cook

The testicular response to hemicastration (in which testicular vein testosterone from the remaining testis doubles in concentration) was studied in vitro in order to establish whether the response is maintained after testicular tissue is removed from the animal. Decapsulated testes and collagenase-dispersed cells from decapsulated testes of rats were incubated for 24 h after hemicastration and testosterone production was compared with that in tissue collected at the time of surgery. Testosterone concentration in the remaining testis 24 h after hemicastration was significantly (P <0·05) higher than in the testis removed at the time of hemicastration, but testosterone production in vitro was similar in both tissues. Apparently the single testis remaining in a hemicastrated rat requires extratesticular support in order to maintain its stimulated state.

Journal of Endocrinology (1989) 121, 43–48







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the Society for Endocrinology.