JOE Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (1991) 128, 229-237       DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1280229
© 1991 Society for Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Madon, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Flint, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Madon, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Flint, D. J.

Long-term effect of a sheep antiserum to rat growth hormone in vivo in rats is explained by the rat anti-sheep immunoglobulin response

R. J. Madon, D. M. Panton and D. J. Flint

A specific antiserum to rat GH (anti-rGH) raised in sheep was used in young male and lactating rats. In both models a group of rats was found which appeared to generate a low response (low responders) to the injected sheep immunoglobulin, and was characterized by the ability of the antiserum to cause inhibition of growth for more than 21 days in the male rats, and to abolish milk yield when prolactin concentrations were lowered in the females. In the groups which generated a high response to the anti-rGH (high responders), growth was retarded for only 2–3 days in male rats, with a moderate milk yield maintained in lactating animals.

The low-response animals were found to have a significantly longer half-life for circulating anti-rGH, when compared with the high-response animals. After 21 days, in the age-matched male rats, levels of anti-rGH were undetectable in the high-responders, whereas the low-response animals, which were nearly 160 g lighter, still had approximately 4·5 ml anti-rGH/1 in their circulation. This anti-rGH was still capable of neutralizing GH, as concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) were 13·6±3·5 (mean ± S.E.M.) and 76·9±2·0 nmol/l in the low-response and high-response groups respectively. The reason for these differences would appear to be that the immune response mounted by these low-response animals to the exogenous sheep immunoglobulin (i.e. rat anti-sheep) 7 days after treatment was less than 10% of that seen in the high-response group.

In male animals the concentration of IGF-I was positively correlated with growth rate.

It is concluded that the effectivenes of the anti-rGH was related to its clearance rate which in turn depended on the ability of the animal to mount an effective anti-sheep response.

Journal of Endocrinology (1991) 128, 229–237







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the Society for Endocrinology.