JOE Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (1998) 156, 299-305       DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1560299
© 1998 Society for Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Flint, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vernon, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Flint, D.
Right arrow Articles by Vernon, R.
Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 156, Issue 2, 299-305
Copyright © 1998 by Society for Endocrinology


Articles

Effects of food restriction on the responses of the mammary gland and adipose tissue to prolactin and growth hormone in the lactating rat

DJ Flint and RG Vernon


Exogenous GH is used extensively in the USA to stimulate milk production in dairy cattle but its effectiveness is reduced in undernourished animals. It has been proposed that GH increases milk yield by stimulating IGF-I secretion and that this IGF-I-response is nutritionally sensitive and thus acts as a 'sensor' of energy balance. To investigate this possibility, we placed lactating rats on three planes of nutrition, ad libitum, 50% or 25% of ad libitum for 48 h. Subgroups of these animals were treated for 48 h with bromocriptine, to suppress prolactin secretion, and anti-rat GH, to neutralize GH action. From 24 to 48 h some of the treated animals were assessed for their milk yield response to prolactin or GH. Food restriction reduced milk yield in control rats by approximately 50% and was accompanied by a catabolic state, as judged by lipid mobilization from adipose tissue and by low concentrations of serum insulin, IGF-I, triiodothyronine and thyroxine, and increased serum nonesterified fatty acid concentrations. In animals fed ad libitum, anti-rat GH plus bromocriptine treatment produced an 80% decrease in milk yield and a dramatic fall in the activity of acetyl-CoA carboxylase in mammary tissue. GH was able to stimulate milk yield when given from 24 to 48 h; however, its effectiveness decreased progressively as food intake was reduced. The milk yield response to GH was accompanied by an increase in serum IGF-I concentrations and this response also decreased progressively with reduction of food intake, consistent with the hypothesis that IGF-I determines the milk yield response to GH and thus regulates GH action on the mammary gland in a nutritionally dependent fashion. However, the milk yield response to prolactin and the milk yield of control rats decreased in line with food intake without any changes in serum IGF-I concentrations. This clearly indicates that factors other than IGF-I are responsible for restricting milk yield. In order to assess other possible candidates for this role, we monitored serum glucose, non-esterified fatty acids, insulin triiodothyronine and thyroxine concentrations, but found no evidence for any simple relationship between these parameters and the milk yield response to prolactin and GH. Surprisingly we found that the ability of GH or prolactin to prevent epithelial cell loss in in the mammary gland was completely insensitive to nutrient intake, despite the fact that IGF-I is considered to be an important survival factor for mammary epithelial cells. Finally, we also demonstrated that, at least during short-term food restriction, the lactating rat is capable of mobilizing significant amounts of lipid from adipose tissue, such that it could provide the total output of triglyceride in milk, which is much greater than has previously been proposed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
M. J. LeBaron, T. J. Ahonen, M. T. Nevalainen, and H. Rui
In Vivo Response-Based Identification of Direct Hormone Target Cell Populations Using High-Density Tissue Arrays
Endocrinology, March 1, 2007; 148(3): 989 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
D. J. Flint, M. T. Travers, M. C. Barber, N. Binart, and P. A. Kelly
Diet-induced obesity impairs mammary development and lactogenesis in murine mammary gland
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2005; 288(6): E1179 - E1187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. Norgaard, A. Sorensen, M. T. Sorensen, J. B. Andersen, and K. Sejrsen
Mammary Cell Turnover and Enzyme Activity in Dairy Cows: Effects of Milking Frequency and Diet Energy Density
J Dairy Sci, March 1, 2005; 88(3): 975 - 982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neuro OncolHome page
S. Yokoyama, H. Hirano, N. Wakimaru, K. P. Sarker, and J.-i. Kuratsu
Inhibitory effect of epigallocatechin-gallate on brain tumor cell lines in vitro
Neuro-oncol, January 1, 2001; 3(1): 22 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. S. Brogan, S. E. Mitchell, P. Trayhurn, and M. S. Smith
Suppression of Leptin During Lactation: Contribution of the Suckling Stimulus Versus Milk Production
Endocrinology, June 1, 1999; 140(6): 2621 - 2627.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
P. Chen, C. Li, C. Haskell-Luevano, R. D. Cone, and M. S. Smith
Altered Expression of Agouti-Related Protein and Its Colocalization with Neuropeptide Y in the Arcuate Nucleus of the Hypothalamus during Lactation
Endocrinology, June 1, 1999; 140(6): 2645 - 2650.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Society for Endocrinology.