JOE
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (1998) 159, 201-209       DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1590201
© 1998 Society for Endocrinology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ciereszko, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ottobre, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ciereszko, R.
Right arrow Articles by Ottobre, J.
Journal of Endocrinology, Vol 159, Issue 2, 201-209
Copyright © 1998 by Society for Endocrinology


Articles

Assessment of the mechanism by which prolactin stimulates progesterone production by early corpora lutea of pigs

RE Ciereszko, BK Petroff, AC Ottobre, Z Guan, BT Stokes, and JS Ottobre


Previously, we reported that administration of prolactin (PRL) during the early luteal phase in sows increases plasma progesterone concentrations. In the current study, we searched for the mechanisms by which PRL exerts this luteotrophic effect. The objectives of the study were (1) to examine the effect of PRL and/or low-density lipoproteins (LDL) on progesterone production by porcine luteal cells derived from early corpora lutea, and (2) to assess the ability of PRL to activate phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C (PI-PLC) and protein kinase C (PKC) in these luteal cells. Ovaries with early corpora lutea (day 1-2 of the oestrous cycle) were obtained from the slaughterhouse. Progesterone production by dispersed luteal cells was measured after treatment with PRL, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate or inhibitors of PKC in the presence or absence of LDL. LDL increased progesterone concentration in the incubation medium (304.5 vs 178.6 ng/ml in control, P<0.05). PRL augmented LDL-stimulated progesterone secretion by luteal cells (to 416 ng/ml, P<0.05), but PRL alone did not affect progesterone production (209.6 ng/ml, P>0.05). Staurosporine, a PKC inhibitor, inhibited progesterone secretion stimulated by the combined action of LDL and PRL; however, such inhibition was not demonstrated when cells were treated with the PKC inhibitor, H-7. PKC activation was assessed by measuring the specific association of [H]phorbol dibutyrate (H-PDBu) with luteal cells after treatment with PRL or ionomycin (a positive control). PRL and ionomycin increased H-PDBu-specific binding in early luteal cells by 28+/-5.5% (within 5 min) and 70.2+/-19.3% (within 2 min) over control binding respectively (P<0.05). In addition, PRL did not augment the LDL-stimulated progesterone production in PKC-deficient cells. In contrast with PKC, total inositol phosphate accumulation, as well as intracellular free calcium concentrations, were not affected by PRL in the current study. We conclude that PRL, in the presence of LDL, stimulates progesterone production by early corpora lutea in vitro. Moreover, PRL appears to activate PKC, but not PI-PLC, in these cells. Thus intracellular transduction of the PRL signal may involve activation of PKC that is not dependent on PI-PLC.





HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the Society for Endocrinology.