JOE
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (1970) 46, 123-124    DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.0460123
© 1970 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CLARKE, A.
Right arrow Articles by KLOPPER, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by CLARKE, A.
Right arrow Articles by KLOPPER, A.

THE MEASUREMENT OF PREGNANEDIOL SULPHATE IN AMNIOTIC FLUID

A. CLARKE and A. KLOPPER

Although the only conjugate of pregnanediol (5β pregnane-3{alpha},20{alpha}-diol) in urine is the glucosiduronate (Crepy, Judas, Rulleau-Meslin & Jayle, 1962) when a foetus is perfused with progesterone some pregnanediol sulphate is formed (Bird, Solomon, Wiqvist & Diczfalusy, 1965). There is thus a possibility that pregnanediol sulphate is largely a foetal product and that its measurement may give some indication of foetal well-being. The identification of pregnanediol sulphate in liquor amnii (Solomon & YoungLai, 1969) and the development of a method for the measurement of all the pregnanediol conjugates in amniotic fluid (Klopper, Wilson & Shearman, 1969) has given rise to the opportunity of examining this possibility. In order to do so it was necessary to find out whether the solvolysis technique of Burstein & Lieberman (1958) for ketosteroid sulphates could be adapted to the separation of pregnanediol sulphate and pregnanediol glucosiduronate. We report here the results of such an investigation and







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 by the Society for Endocrinology.