JOE
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (1970) 46, 55-59    DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.0460055
© 1970 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GERALL, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by McCRADY, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by GERALL, A. A.
Right arrow Articles by McCRADY, R. E.

RECEPTIVITY SCORES OF FEMALE RATS STIMULATED EITHER MANUALLY OR BY MALES

A. A. GERALL and R. E. McCRADY

Receptivity ratings of female rats that had been injected neonatally with either sesame oil or varying amounts of testosterone propionate (TP) were compared, using either a currently used manual technique or males as the test stimuli. Females receiving more than 10 µg. TP when 5 days old either rejected the male or gave minimal lordotic responses when mounted. However, they often responded with complete lordosis when manually stimulated. Untreated females in heat tended to obtain higher receptivity ratings with males than with the manual stimulus. In general, manual test ratings were found to be less related to oestrous conditions than those recorded with males. Some of the limitations and advantages of each method are discussed.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1970 by the Society for Endocrinology.