JOE Society for Endocrinology Archive
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Endocrinology (1975) 65, 259-264    DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.0650259
© 1975 Society for Endocrinology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FINN, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by DOWNIE, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by FINN, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by DOWNIE, J. M.

CHANGES IN THE ENDOMETRIUM OF MICE AFTER THE INDUCTION OF IMPLANTATION BY ACTINOMYCIN D

C. A. FINN and JENIFER M. DOWNIE

Actinomycin D can induce a small number of implantations in pregnant mice undergoing progestin-induced delayed implantation following ovariectomy. However, the response of the uterus to the blastocyst is considerably retarded compared with the response observed when implantation is precipitated by oestradiol.

With the electron microscope the attachment reaction between the trophoblast and uterine epithelium is evident about 48 h after administration of the drug. However, the differentiation of the luminal surface of the epithelial cells in areas of uterus distant from a blastocyst (2nd stage of closure), which normally accompanies implantation, and can be induced by oestradiol in progesterone-treated animals, is not seen. Thus actinomycin D, although allowing implantation to proceed, does not completely mimic the actions of oestradiol on the progesterone-treated uterus.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1975 by the Society for Endocrinology.